Page 1
Standard

Dialogue Interviews

Dialogue Interviews are a part of the sensing phase of the Preconditions for the Lab. They allow for a deeper understanding of the context and systemic dynamics of the social challenge at hand. They allow for a building of trust between key players in the system and the lab team, as well as an immersion in the unique perspectives of those with the most experience with the local context.

 

The Guide to Dialogue Interviews gives the interviewer and the scribe an outline of how they can organize themselves in preparation, during and after the dialogue interview process. For more information on Dialogue Interviews read the Dialogue interview handout, below.

GUIDE TO DIALOGUE INTERVIEWS

 

The Dialogue Interview Handout provides details of the theory behind dialogue interviews along with more information on setting up and running the interviews. If you would like a shorter handout with just the interview protocol you can down load the Guide to Dialogue Interviews, above.

DIALOGUE INTERVIEW HANDOUT

 

The Dialogue Interview Self Assessment is a form that participants completed before and after the Dialogue Interview Training session. It asks them to self assess their level of experience in relation to listening and scribing. Participants completed the form at the start of the session and then revisited their answers after the training to see if their self-assessment had changed.

DIALOGUE INTERVIEW SELF-ASSESSMENT

 

The Dialogue Interview Training Agenda shows the facilitators agenda/outline for a training session for individuals interested in conducting Dialogue Interviews. The training is a one-day session where the outcomes for participants are:

  • Understand the rationale and method of Dialogue Interviews
  • Practice each role – Interviewee, Interviewer, and Scribe
  • Have a grounded self assessment of their ability to conduct Dialogue Interviews
DIALOGUE INTERVIEW TRAINING AGENDA

 

The end
Standard

Diverging Chicago Research

Diverging Chicago is a series of graphs produced from statistical data which compare a number of social indicators in Chicago. They represent one view of the city and give some grounding to the Grove3547 challenge. While they do not represent individual views or experiences, they are an aggregate view of what is going on systemically during a specific period of time in the region. This kind of research can help clarify intentions for, and support the case for doing a social lab.

DIVERGING CHICAGO

 

The end
Standard

The Grove Kick Off Workshop

The Kick-off Orientation Pack is the information packet that lab participants were given at the kickoff workshop.

KICK-OFF ORIENTATION PACK

 

Kick-off Facilitator Agenda is a detailed breakdown of the Hosting and Facilitation Teams’ timeline for the kickoff workshop. It highlights timings, processes and notes for the team to consider and keep in mind during the workshop. Agendas like this were usually designed in advance, and then iterated a number of times before and during the process to adjust and adapt to the shifting context within the group and the project.

KICK-OFF FACILITATOR AGENDA

 

The Kick-off Evaluation Form was given to participants at the close of the Kick-off workshop to gague their experience and offer feedback to the Hosting Team.

KICK-OFF EVALUATION FORM

 

The Kick-off Workshop Report details the proceedings of the Kick-off workshop. It provides information from the different sessions of the workshop, and highlights the processes and some of the methods used during the three days.

KICK-OFF REPORT

 

The end
Standard

Studio 1

The Facilitator Agenda for the 1st Studio provides a detailed breakdown of the Hosting and Facilitation Teams’ agenda for the 1st Studio Workshop. It highlights timings, processes and notes for the team to consider and keep in mind during the workshop. Agendas like this were usually designed in advance, and then iterated a number of times before and during the process to adjust and adapt to the shifting context within the group and the project.

STUDIO 1 – FACILITATOR AGENDA

 

The Participants Agenda for the 1st Studio was given to participants in advance of the workshop. It shows the days activities as well as the co-created purpose and intentions of the workshop.

STUDIO 1 – PARTICIPANT AGENDA

 

The Studio 1 Evaluation Form was given to participants at the close of the 1st Studio to gauge their experience and offer feedback to the Hosting Team.

STUDIO 1 – EVALUATION FORM

 

The Studio 1 Workshop Report documents the proceedings of the 1st Studio. It provides information from the different sessions of the workshop, and highlights the processes and some of the methods used during the studio.

STUDIO 1 – REPORT
The end
Standard

Studio 2

The Facilitator Agenda for the 2nd Studio provides a detailed breakdown of the Hosting and Facilitation Teams’ agenda for the 2nd Studio Workshop. It highlights timings, processes and notes for the team to consider and keep in mind during the workshop. Agendas like this were usually designed in advance, and then iterated a number of times before and during the process to adjust and adapt to the shifting context within the group and the project.

STUDIO 2 – FACILITATOR AGENDA

 

The Participants Agenda for the 2nd Studio was given to participants in advance of the workshop. It shows the days activities as well as the co-created purpose and intentions of the workshop.

STUDIO 2 – PARTICIPANT AGENDA

 

The Studio 2 Evaluation Form was given to participants at the close of the 2nd Studio to gauge their experience and offer feedback to the Hosting Team.

STUDIO 2 – EVALUATION FORM

 

The Studio 2 Workshop Report documents the proceedings of the 2nd Studio. It provides information from the different sessions of the workshop, and highlights the processes and some of the methods used during the studio.

STUDIO 2 – REPORT
The end
Standard

Studio 3

The Facilitator Agenda for the 3rd Studio provides a detailed breakdown of the Hosting and Facilitation Teams’ agenda for the 3rd Studio Workshop. It highlights timings, processes and notes for the team to consider and keep in mind during the workshop. Agendas like this were usually designed in advance, and then iterated a number of times before and during the process to adjust and adapt to the shifting context within the group and the project.

STUDIO 3 – FACILITATOR AGENDA

 

The Participants Agenda for the 3rd Studio was given to participants in advance of the workshop. It shows the days activities as well as the co-created purpose and intentions of the workshop.

STUDIO 3 – PARTICIPANT AGENDA

 

The Studio 3 Evaluation Form was given to participants at the close of the 3rd Studio to gauge their experience and offer feedback to the Hosting Team.

STUDIO 3 – EVALUATION FORM

 

The Studio 3 Workshop Report documents the proceedings of the 3rd Studio. It provides information from the different sessions of the workshop, and highlights the processes and some of the methods used during the studio.

STUDIO 3 – REPORT
The end
Standard

The Grove3547 Integrated Report

The Grove 3547 Integrated Report documents the project overall and its outputs and results.

GROVE 3547 INTEGRATED REPORT

The primary outputs of The Grove are the 5 teams and their prototypes, and the value and relationships resulting from their work.

To learn more about the teams and their projects, visit the Grove Website, The Media Archive, and/or check out the materials in the archive below.

VISIT THE GROVE WEBSITE

ACCESS THE FULL MEDIA ARCHIVE

The end